{"id":41353,"date":"2026-10-19T04:31:25","date_gmt":"2026-10-18T20:31:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/?vuln=cve-2026-110324"},"modified":"2026-10-19T04:31:25","modified_gmt":"2026-10-18T20:31:25","slug":"cve-2026-110324","status":"publish","type":"vuln","link":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/?vuln=cve-2026-110324","title":{"rendered":"CVE-2026-110324 &#8211; The visibility check of Gitea user profiles was applied to GET requests only, while `POST"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The visibility check of Gitea user profiles was applied to GET requests only, while `POST \/{username}` (follow and unfollow) required only a signed-in user. Any authenticated user could therefore obtain the full name, location, website and description of a user with a private profile from the response. The issue was fixed in 28.1.0 and disclosed with 28.2.0.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The visibility check of Gitea user profiles was applied to GET requests only, while `POST \/{username}` (follow and unfollow) required only a signed-in user. Any authenticated user could therefore obta<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41353","vuln","type-vuln","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/vuln\/41353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/vuln"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/vuln"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=41353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=41353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=41353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}