{"id":25504,"date":"2026-09-18T04:31:28","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T20:31:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/?vuln=cve-2026-90095"},"modified":"2026-09-18T04:31:28","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T20:31:28","slug":"cve-2026-90095","status":"publish","type":"vuln","link":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/?vuln=cve-2026-90095","title":{"rendered":"CVE-2026-90095 &#8211; In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfuse: Fix the conditi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:<\/p>\n<p>fuse: Fix the condition to enable over-io-uring<\/p>\n<p>The existing condition in fuse_uring_cmd() is there only to avoid<br \/>\ndisabling io-uring for connections that already run with it, missing<br \/>\nwas a condition to refuse any IORING_OP_URING_CMD if the<br \/>\nconnection\/channel didn&#8217;t get enabled because of missing FUSE_INIT<br \/>\nreply flag FUSE_OVER_IO_URING. Without the reply flag the barrier in<br \/>\nfuse_uring_ready() doesn&#8217;t work and IO could already be going on and<br \/>\ncause deadlock states (at a minimum one between fch-&gt;bg_lock and<br \/>\nqueue-&gt;lock).<\/p>\n<p>The change itself is trivial, but brings behavior change,<br \/>\nFUSE_OVER_IO_URING has to be set in the FUSE_INIT_REPLY by fuse servers<br \/>\nto accept any IORING_OP_URING_CMD. Libfuse does that and the only<br \/>\nnon-libfuse implementation I found (fractal-fuse) also does it.<br \/>\nQemu patches for fuse-io-uring are not merged yet, as far as I know.<\/p>\n<p>Moved up is the smp_load_acquire(&amp;fch-&gt;initialized) check, as a<br \/>\nfuse-server implementation might try to setup io-uring before FUSE_INIT<br \/>\nis processed and might have gotten -EOPNOTSUPP instead of -EAGAIN.<\/p>\n<p>Also fixed is a stale comment that explains the handling of the<br \/>\nFUSE_OVER_IO_URING flag in early RFC versions.<\/p>\n<p>If there should be a report from any library or application we<br \/>\nprobably need to revert this commit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:<\/p>\n<p>fuse: Fix the condition to enable over-io-uring<\/p>\n<p>The existing condition in fuse_uring_cmd() is there only to avoid<br \/>\ndisabling io-uri<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25504","vuln","type-vuln","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/vuln\/25504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/vuln"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/vuln"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}