{"id":11556,"date":"2026-09-04T18:53:41","date_gmt":"2026-09-04T10:53:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/?vuln=cve-2026-14457"},"modified":"2026-09-04T18:53:41","modified_gmt":"2026-09-04T10:53:41","slug":"cve-2026-14457","status":"publish","type":"vuln","link":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/?vuln=cve-2026-14457","title":{"rendered":"CVE-2026-14457 [HIGH] &#8211; Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs)\nena"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs)<br \/>\nenabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally,<br \/>\na NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and<br \/>\nalso sends the typically omitted &#8220;signature_algorithms_cert&#8221; TLS extension.<\/p>\n<p>Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of<br \/>\nan application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.<\/p>\n<p>CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference<\/p>\n<p>Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests<br \/>\nthat key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration<br \/>\nis to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or<br \/>\nsigned by any convenient CA).<\/p>\n<p>When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the<br \/>\n&#8220;signature_algorithms_cert&#8221; extension is handled reliably even without the<br \/>\nfix, and peer clients or servers that don&#8217;t support raw public keys may be<br \/>\nable to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding<br \/>\ncertificate or its public key.<\/p>\n<p>Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate<br \/>\nneed to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.<\/p>\n<p>FIPS impact: no<\/p>\n<p>No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation<br \/>\nis outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs)<br \/>\nenabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally,<br \/>\na NULL pointer dereference<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11556","vuln","type-vuln","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/vuln\/11556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/vuln"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/vuln"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.54iter.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}